AN ASSESSMENT OF INDONESIAN CHARTER AIRLINE WEBSITE QUALITY
Sari
Abstract: The usage of website is increasingly important for business in general including aviation industry because it provides additional benefits for the business. That is the reason why managing and maintaining a good website is very important in this digital age. One method to measure website quality was using the nine composite criteria of website assessment. The purpose of this study is to improve Premiair website quality, as one of the players in the air charter business in Indonesia. Using the nine composite criteria as an assessing framework and for improvement purpose, we benchmark Premiair website with XOJET website. Based on the interview, the result shows that there are indeed rooms for Premiair website to improve its quality. The researchers suggest major changes to its website in order to create a better quality website.
Keywords: Website quality, Assessment, Nine Composite Criteria, Air Charter, Premiair
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
References
Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information and Management, 39(6), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00113-6
Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584
Fahzi, M., Sam, M., & Tahir, M. N. H. (2009). Website Quality and Costumer Online Purchase Intention of Air Ticket. International Journal of Engineering & Science.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hanke, M., & Teo, T. S. H. (2003). Meeting the Challenges in Globalizing Electronic Commerce at United Airlines. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 5(4), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2003.10856031
Kim, S., & Stoel, L. (2004). Dimensional hierarchy of retail website quality. Information and Management, 41(5), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.07.002
Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00049-5
Moustakis, V. S., Litos, C., Dalivigas, A., & Tsironis, L. (2004). Website Quality Assessment Criteria. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-04), 59–73.
Purwanto, B., Tinggi, S., Tristakti, M. T., Rafi, S., & Pongoh, H. (2016). Human Resources on Transport, Telecommunication, and Tourism Sectors in Global Perspective, 3(3), 327–338.
Ryan, D., & Jones, C. (2009). Summary for Policymakers. Digital Marketing: Marketing strategies for engaging the digital generation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Simarmata, J., Keke, Y., & Panjaitan, F. (2016). the Airline Customer ’ S Buying Decision Through Online Travel Agent : a Case Study of the Passengers, IV(3), 335–349.
Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760. https://doi.org/http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-3/qid.pdf
Wells, J., Valacich, J., & Hess, T. (2011). What Signals Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 373–396. https://doi.org/Article
Willis, J. (2007). Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches. Qualitative Research, 356. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230108
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.